Skip Navigation


The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Advance Access originally published online on April 6, 2009
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2009 64A(8):896-901; doi:10.1093/gerona/glp033
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
64A/8/896    most recent
glp033v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verghese, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verghese, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Quantitative Gait Markers and Incident Fall Risk in Older Adults

Joe Verghese1, Roee Holtzer1,2, Richard B. Lipton1,3 and Cuiling Wang3

1 Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, Bronx, New York
2 Ferkauf School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, New York
3 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, Bronx, New York

Address correspondence to Joe Verghese, MBBS, MD, Einstein Aging Study, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, 1165 Morris Park Avenue, Room 338, Bronx, NY 10461. Email: jverghes{at}aecom.yu.edu


   Abstract

Background: Identifying quantitative gait markers of falls in older adults may improve diagnostic assessments and suggest novel intervention targets.

Methods: We studied 597 adults aged 70 and older (mean age 80.5 years, 62% women) enrolled in an aging study who received quantitative gait assessments at baseline. Association of speed and six other gait markers (cadence, stride length, swing, double support, stride length variability, and swing time variability) with incident fall rate was studied using generalized estimation equation procedures adjusted for age, sex, education, falls, chronic illnesses, medications, cognition, disability as well as traditional clinical tests of gait and balance.

Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 20 months, 226 (38%) of the 597 participants fell. Mean fall rate was 0.44 per person-year. Slower gait speed (risk ratio [RR] per 10 cm/s decrease 1.069, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001–1.142) was associated with higher risk of falls in the fully adjusted models. Among six other markers, worse performance on swing (RR 1.406, 95% CI 1.027–1.926), double-support phase (RR 1.165, 95% CI 1.026–1.321), swing time variability (RR 1.007, 95% CI 1.004–1.010), and stride length variability (RR 1.076, 95% CI 1.030–1.111) predicted fall risk. The associations remained significant even after accounting for cognitive impairment and disability.

Conclusions: Quantitative gait markers are independent predictors of falls in older adults. Gait speed and other markers, especially variability, should be further studied to improve current fall risk assessments and to develop new interventions.

Keywords Gait; Falls

Received: August 6, 2008; Accepted: January 7, 2009


Decision Editor: Luigi Ferrucci, MD, PhD


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.