The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Advance Access originally published online on July 17, 2009
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2009 64A(11):1175-1176; doi:10.1093/gerona/glp096
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.
Beyond Dueling Models
Commentary Responding to: Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L. The Challenge of Understanding the Disablement Process in Older Persons and Freedman V. Adopting the ICF Language for Studying Late-life Disability: A Field of Dreams?
Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health, Massachusetts
Address correspondence to Alan M. Jette, PhD, PT, Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street-T5W, Boston, MA 02118. Email: ajette@bu.edu
Received: June 23, 2009; Accepted: June 23, 2009
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
ID like to begin by thanking Drs Guralnik, Ferrucci, and Freedman for their thoughtful reflections in response to my guest editorial, Toward a Common Language of Disablement (1). These efforts will initiate an important dialogue within gerontology that I believe will be very useful in furthering the study of late-life disability.
The commentators and I agree that there is merit in having an internationally agreed-upon language and framework for the study of late-life disability. Where opinions diverge is over whether or not the ICF
| FUNDING |
|---|